On Wednesday 26 April 2017 7:31:38 PM Johnson Lau wrote: > I prefer not to do anything that requires pools software upgrade or wallet > upgrade. So I prefer to keep the dummy marker, and not change the > commitment structure as suggested by another post.
Fair enough, I guess. Although I think the dummy marker could actually be non- consensus critical so long as the hashing replaces it with a 0. > For your second suggestion, I think we should keep scriptSig empty as that > should be obsoleted. If you want to put something in scriptSig, you should > put it in witness instead. There are things scriptSig can do that witness cannot today - specifically add additional conditions under the signature. We can always obsolete scriptSig later, after segwit has provided an alternative way to do this. > Maybe we could restrict witness to IsPushOnly() scriptPubKey, so miners > can’t put garbage to legacy txs. They already can malleate transactions and add garbage to the blocks. I don't see the benefit here. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
