On Friday, 26 May 2017 19:47:11 CEST Jacob Eliosoff via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Forgive me if this is a dumb question.
Sorry for picking your email. I understand people want something different for the agreement, I know I do too. We have a specific agreement on the table, signed by a huge subsection of the industry. Maybe the time for changing things is not to be *after* the signatures are set. I know I’d change some detials. But do we really want to go through another conference where all the important people are present to agree on a compromise? Or can we use the one we have? The compromise is pretty simple; https://medium.com/@DCGco/bitcoin-scaling-agreement-at-consensus-2017-133521fe9a77 * Activate Segregated Witness at an 80% threshold, signaling at bit 4 * Activate a 2 MB hard fork within six months -- Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
