This idea is highly contentious as it would guarantee a viable chain of Bitcoin 
with SegWit activated whether BIP148 gained sufficient support or not. I am not 
necessarily advocating it - just putting it out for discussion. While the 
downside is that it could permanently split the network, the upside is that it 
could heap additional pressure on miners to follow the BIP148 chain and ensure 
a minimally disruptive upgrade. This is pure game theory.



MR POWA (Mining Reactive Proof of Work Addition) is a method to introduce an 
additional proof of work to a blockchain in response to a detected mining 
behaviour.



In the case of BIP148, the criteria for activation could be when the software 
detects a non-BIP148 compliant chain that is 144 blocks (24 hours) ahead of a 
BIP148 compliant chain.



At this stage the software would change its consensus rules (hard fork) to do 
two things:

  *   Lower the difficulty for existing PoW method (SHA256).

  *   Introduce a second POW method, such as Scrypt or Ethash, that is 
incompatible with SHA256 hardware but already has an established mining 
industry for altcoins.



The difficulty should be low, and blocks will initially be found much more 
quickly than every 10 minutes until the difficulty adjusts. Each method would 
have its own difficulty. It could be a requirement that POW methods alternate 
to neutralise attacks from the other chain.



This would guarantee SegWit activation. Anybody who is already running a BIP148 
node could just as easily run a BIP148 + MR POWA node. This could not 
realistically be supported by Core and would have to be implemented in a 
grassroots movement, similar to BIP148.



Ideally, it would just force the miners to follow the BIP148 chain (or risk the 
value of their hardware being hurt) and the code would never be activated. MR 
POWA would mean BIP148 miners would no longer need to “hold their nerve” as 
they would be guaranteed a viable chain and rewarded for their early support.


Regards,


John Hardy

[email protected]


_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to