On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Quite simply, I just don't think the cost-benefit tradeoff of what you're > proposing makes sense.
I agree that dropping zero value outputs is a needless loss of flexibility. In addition to the CT example, something similar could be done for increased precision (nanobitcoin!). Maybe if in the future the value of 1e-8 btc is high enough then an argument could be made that requiring one is a meaningful reduction in a miner's ability to spam up the network... but the argument doesn't fly today... the cost in lost fee income from the spam just totally dwarfs it. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
