Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> It's not clear to me if you are have looked at the previous UTXO set > commitment proposals. > > some utxo set commitment bookmarks (a little old) > http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/bitcoin/utxo-commitments-or-fraud-proofs.stdout.txt > > TXO bitfields > http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/sf-bitcoin-meetup/2017-07-08-bram-cohen-merkle-sets/ > > delayed TXO commitments > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012715.html > > TXO commitments do not need a soft-fork to be useful > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-February/013591.html > > rolling UTXO set hashes > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014337.html > > lotta other resources available, including source code proposals.. Thanks! Has anyone categoried list discussions by topic like this? It seems a lot of this stuff is scattered between mailing lists, irc conversations, etc and can be hard to know whats floating out there. -- https://jb55.com _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
