On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Greg Sanders <gsander...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if I missed the rationale earlier, but why not just do a transaction, > with a FORKID specifically for this? Then a node can have a mempool > acceptance test that returns true even if the signature is not valid as per > Bitcoin consensus, but only due to the FORKID? > > This way basically any wallet can support this provided generic FORKID > support.
You'd basically have to provide an entire transaction rather than just the signature, so there's some overhead. (Copy-pasting may become unwieldy quicker.) _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
