On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Natanael via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Consider for example a P2SH address for some fund, where you create a > transaction in advance. Even if the parties involved in signing the > transaction would agree (collude), the original intent of this particular > P2SH address may be to hold the fund accountable by enforcing some given > rules by script. To be able to circumvent the rules could break the purpose > of the fund.
I am having a bit of difficulty understanding your example. If graftroot were possible it would mean that the funds were paid to a public key. That holder(s) of the corresponding private key could sign without constraint, and so the accoutability you're expecting wouldn't exist there regardless of graftroot. I think maybe your example is only making the case that it should be possible to send funds constrained by a script without a public key ever existing at all. If so, I agree-- but that wasn't the question here as I understood it. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
