On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 5:55 PM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > This has the same problems BIP149 did: since there is no signalling, it is > ambiguous whether the softfork has activated at all.
You only need to see one block in the heaviest valid chain to dissolve that ambiguity. There are a lot of volunteers in this space who would (collectively) commit a few block's worth of hashrate, to know. > Additionally, it loses the flexibility of BIP 8 to, after the initial > deployment, move the timeoutheight sooner. It doesn't interfere with concurrent UASFs using any combination of timeoutheights. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
