(IMO), where this proposal really excels, is mutlisig. And if you check my
commits, it actually originally was for multisig only, and I extended it for
multisig and single sig wallets.
ghost43 and Jochen Hoenicke brought up important issues with this proposed BIP
re: single sig wallets, so I will be reverting this back for multisig
derivations. I believe that should cover all concerns.
Please view the updated BIP here:
https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/blob/Sane_Mulitisg_deriv/Modern%20Hierarchy%20for%20Deterministic%20Multisignature%20Wallets.mediawiki
And the updated PR here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/pull/1
Thank you,
Robert
Personal Fingerprint: BF0D 3C08 A439 5AC6 11C1 5395 B70B 4A77 F850 548F
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:44 PM, Robert Spigler via bitcoin-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I (Robert Spigler) will respond in a next post.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
