The "No Taproot" section of the Sapio docs need updating :) What are your plans to take advantage of Taproot with Sapio? It would have been interesting to see what a Taproot emulator would have looked like, although no need for it now. It seems to me Taproot would have been harder to emulate than CTV though I could be wrong.
https://learn.sapio-lang.org/ch05-02-taproot.html Also there have been a number of people asking questions about Sapio and CTV on the Libera equivalents of Freenode channels #sapio and ##ctv-bip-review over the past months. Do you plan to join and claim those channels? Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 03:26:23 -0700 From: Jeremy <jlru...@mit.edu> To: Andrew Poelstra <apoels...@wpsoftware.net>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Is there a tool like Ethereum EVM at present for Bitcoin script? Message-ID: <CAD5xwhgmAepA4jW3tK7nihMFsMEdgs0Z6UEs3k=3j1sodea...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This has actually never been true (Sapio assumes extensions). If the extensions are not present, you can stub them out with a signing federation instead, configurable as flags, and you can also write many contracts that do not use the ctv based components at all. The protocol for emulation is a bit clever (if I do say so myself) since it ensures that contract compilation is completely offline and the oracles are completely stateless. Relevant links: https://learn.sapio-lang.org/ch05-01-ctv-emulator.html https://learn.sapio-lang.org/ch03-02-finish.html Cheers, Jeremy -- Michael Folkson Email: michaelfolk...@gmail.com Keybase: michaelfolkson PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3 _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
