I probably need to reset it -- I ran into some issues with the IBD latch bug IIRC and had difficulty producing new blocks.
I sent funds as a manual faucet to at least one person... not aware of anyone else finding use for the signet. In part this is due to the fact that in order to run a signet, you also kind of need to run some kind of faucet on it, which wasn't readily available when I launched it previously. I think I can use https://github.com/jsarenik/bitcoin-faucet-shell now though. Usually people are using Regtest to play around with CTV less so Signet. There is value in a signet, but I don't think that "there's not a signet for it" is a blocking issue v.s. nice to have. -- @JeremyRubin <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin> <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:18 AM Anthony Towns via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 01:14:07PM +0000, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > There is not even a custom signet with CTV (as far as I know) > > https://twitter.com/jeremyrubin/status/1339699281192656897 > > > signetchallenge=512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e706612ee882759351ae > addnode=50.18.75.225 > > But I think there's only been a single coinbase consolidation tx, and no > actual CTV transactions? > > Cheers, > aj > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
