+1 I'd participate. Certain human/organizational limitations prevent things being said in logged channels that sometimes can be shared in person. Sometimes people break through misunderstandings in person, through either informal mingling or the use of Chatham House rules. So I would also advocate restarting the Scaling Bitcoin conferences, twice a year.
One request for the agenda: I perceived a lot of "Oh, well it's also fine to just wait and see what comes" in the prior discussions. The idea that we should reopen this discussion presumes that it is better to not wait, because having even imperfect covenant designs will cause the ecosystem to explore what use cases to allocate developer interest in (as long as the fees are not too far off - yeah I'm looking at you, CSFS). Because of this, I also propose asking some of the more advanced scripting technologists to reveal what of their work is currently science, what is engineering, and what is product-oriented with understandable delivery dates. I think that if more people understood the answers to these questions then there would be more room for incremental exploration of the space. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
