I've updated the BIP text to allow arbitrary length tuples.
On 07/27/2022 04:44 AM, Pavol Rusnak wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 00:28, Andrew Chow <achow101-li...@achow101.com> wrote:
>
>> However I don't see why this couldn't generalize to any sized tuples. As
>> long as the tuples are all the same length, and the limit is one tuple per
>> key expression, then we don't get any combinatorial blowup issues.
>
> I think it's worthwhile to generalize for any sized tuples. I don't have any
> existing particular use case in mind, because BIP-44, BIP-84, etc. are fine
> with just using <0;1>, but there might be some upcoming standards in the
> future that will want to introduce more sub-paths.
>
> --
>
> Best Regards / S pozdravom,
>
> Pavol "stick" Rusnak
> Co-Founder, SatoshiLabs
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
