Hi all,

Today I am publishing "Validity Rollups on Bitcoin", a report I produced as 
part of the Human Rights Foundation's ZK-Rollup Research Fellowship.

Here's the preface:

> Ever since Satoshi Nakamoto first publicly announced bitcoin, its supporters, 
> critics, and skeptics alike have questioned how the protocol would scale as 
> usage increases over time. This question is more important than ever today, 
> as blocks are increasingly full or close to full of transactions. So-called 
> "Layer 2" (L2) protocols such as the Lightning Network have been deployed to 
> take some transaction volume "offchain" but even Lightning needs to use 
> _some_ bitcoin block space. It's clear that as bitcoin is adopted by more and 
> more of the world's population (human and machine alike!) more block space 
> will be needed. Another thread of inquiry concerns whether bitcoin's limited 
> scripting capabilities help or hinder its value as electronic cash. 
> Researchers and inventors have shown that the electronic cash transactions 
> first made possible by bitcoin could be given new form by improving 
> transaction privacy, supporting new types of smart contracts, and even 
> creating entirely new blockchain-based assets.
> 
> One of the results of the decade-plus research into scaling and expanding the 
> capabilities of blockchains such as bitcoin is the invention of the validity 
> rollup. Given the observed benefits that validity rollups have for the 
> blockchains that have already implemented them, attention now turns to the 
> question of whether they would be beneficial for bitcoin and existing bitcoin 
> L2 protocols such as Lightning, too. We explore this question by examining 
> validity rollups from several angles, including their history, how they work 
> on a technical level, how they could be built on bitcoin, and what the 
> benefits, costs, and risks of building them on bitcoin might be. We conclude 
> that validity rollups have the potential to improve the scalability, privacy, 
> and programmability of bitcoin without sacrificing bitcoin's core values or 
> functionality as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Given the "trustless" 
> nature of validity rollups as cryptographically-secured extensions of their 
> parent chain, and given bitcoin's status as the most secure settlement layer, 
> one could even say these protocols are a _perfect match_ for one another.

You can find the full report here:

https://bitcoinrollups.org

Happy to receive any comments and answer any questions the bitcoin dev 
community may have about the report!

Best regards,
John Light
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to