On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:02:35AM -1000, David A. Harding wrote: > On 2023-01-09 22:47, Peter Todd wrote: > > How do you propose that the participants learn about the double-spend? > > Without > > knowing that it happened, they can't respond as you suggested. > > I can think of various ways---many of them probably the same ideas that > would occur to you.
Rather than playing games, how about you actually list those ways. > More concise than listing them is to just assume > they exist and realize that any protocol software which wants to defeat > the $17.00 pinning attack needs to implement some sort of conflict > monitoring system---but by using that monitoring system to defeat the > $17.00 pinning attack, the software also defeats the $0.05 individual > conflicting input attack without any need for full-RBF. Remember, we'd like decentralized coinjoin implementations like Joinmarket to work. How does a decentralized coinjoin implement "conflict monitoring"? -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
