On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 05:41:14AM -1000, David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Question: is there a recommended way to produce a shorter identifier for > inline use in reading material? For example, for proposal > BIN-2024-0001-000, I'm thinking: > > - BIN24-1 (references whatever the current version of the proposal is) > - BIN24-1.0 (references revision 0) > > I think that doesn't look too bad even if there are over 100 proposals a > year, with some of them getting into over a hundred revisions: > > - BIN24-123 > - BIN24-123.123
Having lived through y2k, two-digit years give me the ick, but otherwise sure. Cheers, aj, that's how the kids who didn't live through y2k say it, right? _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
