So,

The proposal is simple, and it's a small change for miners, I imagine.

My question is: why?

I worry about stuffing too many requirements on the coinbase. I suppose the
coinbase is easily extendible if we run out of bytes, but I think I'd like
to see some more discussion / good / bad type cases for making this change.
What do we get over just the prev_hash by doing this?

If this is just a voting mechanism for moving to v2 blocks, that's cool,
but it would be nice to codify voting in the coinbase a bit? Maybe? We've
now once voted with /p2sh/ and this is a different mechanism now, if I
understand it properly.

Anyway, some background would be great; if I missed it, I'm happy to go
read up, but I didn't see any links on the wiki.

Peter

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgar...@exmulti.com> wrote:

> Please review and comment...
>
> Block v2, Height in Coinbase
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0034
>
>   BIP: 34
>   Title: Block v2, Height in Coinbase
>   Author: Gavin Andresen <gavinandre...@gmail.com>
>   Status: Draft
>   Type: Standards Track
>   Created: 2012-07-06
>
> Abstract
>
> Bitcoin blocks and transactions are versioned binary structures. Both
> currently use version 1. This BIP introduces an upgrade path for
> versioned transactions and blocks. A unique nonce is added to newly
> produced coinbase transactions, and blocks are updated to version 2.
>
>
> Motivation
>
> 1.    Clarify and exercise the mechanism whereby the bitcoin network
> collectively consents to upgrade transaction or block binary
> structures, rules and behaviors.
>
> 2.    Enforce block and transaction uniqueness, and assist unconnected
> block validation.
>
>
> Specification
>
> 1.    Treat transactions with a version greater than 1 as non-standard
> (official Satoshi client will not mine or relay them).
>
> 2.    Add height as the first item in the coinbase transaction's
> scriptSig, and increase block version to 2. The format of the height
> is "serialized CScript" -- first byte is number of bytes in the number
> (will be 0x03 on main net for the next 300 or so years), following
> bytes are little-endian representation of the number.
>
> 3.    75% rule: If 750 of the last 1,000 blocks are version 2 or
> greater, reject invalid version 2 blocks. (testnet3: 51 of last 100)
>
> 4.    95% rule ("Point of no return"): If 950 of the last 1,000 blocks
> are version 2 or greater, reject all version 1 blocks. (testnet3: 75
> of last 100)
>
>
> Backward compatibility
>
> All older clients are compatible with this change. Users and merchants
> should not be impacted. Miners are strongly recommended to upgrade to
> version 2 blocks. Once 95% of the miners have upgraded to version 2,
> the remainder will be orphaned if they fail to upgrade.
>
>
> Implementation
>
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1525 and
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1526
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> exMULTI, Inc.
> jgar...@exmulti.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>



-- 
------------------------------

[image: CoinLab Logo]PETER VESSENES
CEO

*pe...@coinlab.com * /  206.486.6856  / SKYPE: vessenes
811 FIRST AVENUE  /  SUITE 480  /  SEATTLE, WA 98104
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

Reply via email to