bitcoin-development  

Messages by Date

• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
• 2014/06/25 [Bitcoin-development] Wallet nLockTime best practices Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bill Request Message - (another) Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension slush
• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension sebastien requiem
• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Jorge Timón
• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bill Request Message - (another) Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/25 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gavin Andresen
• 2014/06/24 [Bitcoin-development] Bill Request Message - (another) Proposed BIP 70 extension Paul Goldstein
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Andy Alness
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Roy Badami
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Drak
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Andreas Schildbach
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Justus Ranvier
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension slush
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Pieter Wuille
• 2014/06/24 [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Thomas Voegtlin
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Tamas Blummer
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/24 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
• 2014/06/23 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
• 2014/06/23 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
• 2014/06/23 [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
• 2014/06/21 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin miner heads-up: "getwork" RPC going away Pieter Wuille
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Peter Todd
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mark Friedenbach
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: slush
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: slush
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mark Friedenbach
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Justus Ranvier
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mark Friedenbach
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Kevin
• 2014/06/19 [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Sergio Lerner
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
• 2014/06/19 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Peter Todd
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0 confirmation txs using replace-by-fee and game theory Isidor Zeuner
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Natanael
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/18 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Wladimir
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Tom Harding
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Tom Harding
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Peter Todd
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question Kristov Atlas
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question Gregory Maxwell
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fidelity bonds for decentralized instant confirmation guarantees Mark Friedenbach
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/17 [Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question Odinn Cyberguerrilla
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fidelity bonds for decentralized instant confirmation guarantees Goss, Brian C., M.D.
• 2014/06/17 [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Raúl Martínez
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Karel Bílek
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Odinn Cyberguerrilla
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Isidor Zeuner
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Isidor Zeuner
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Isidor Zeuner
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released Wladimir
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released Jesus Cea
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Christophe Biocca
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Ron Elliott
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Raúl Martínez
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Ron Elliott
• 2014/06/17 [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released Wladimir
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Mistr Bigs
• 2014/06/17 [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Raúl Martínez
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Matt Whitlock
• 2014/06/17 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
• 2014/06/17 [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Peter Todd
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Justus Ranvier
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fidelity bonds for decentralized instant confirmation guarantees Peter Todd
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Alex Kotenko
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Justus Ranvier
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Matt Whitlock
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Jorge Timón
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Alex Kotenko
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Matt Whitlock
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Justus Ranvier
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Matt Whitlock
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Paul Goldstein
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/16 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• 2014/06/16 [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Odinn Cyberguerrilla
• 2014/06/15 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/15 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Andreas Schildbach
• 2014/06/15 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/14 Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Andreas Schildbach
• 2014/06/14 [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Mark Friedenbach
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Un Ix
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Matt Whitlock
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Un Ix
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Matt Whitlock
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final xor
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Pavel Janík
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
• 2014/06/13 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Pavel Janík
• 2014/06/13 [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
• 2014/06/11 [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? Wladimir
• 2014/06/11 Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds unstable Andreas Schildbach
• 2014/06/11 Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds unstable Alex Kotenko
• 2014/06/11 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/10 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
• 2014/06/10 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/10 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
• 2014/06/10 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/10 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/10 [Bitcoin-development] 0.9.2rc2 tagged, gitian builds needed Wladimir
• 2014/06/09 Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP38 Encrypted Address Discussion Gregory Maxwell
• 2014/06/09 [Bitcoin-development] BIP38 Encrypted Address Discussion Richard Moore
• 2014/06/09 [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Your bit4coin order Kf Lee
• 2014/06/09 Re: [Bitcoin-development] PSA: Please sign your git commits Chris Beams
• 2014/06/08 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
• 2014/06/08 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
• 2014/06/07 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Alan Reiner
• 2014/06/07 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
• 2014/06/07 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin miner heads-up: "getwork" RPC going away Wladimir
• 2014/06/06 [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin miner heads-up: "getwork" RPC going away Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." <<<<NOT Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Andrew Poelstra
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Pieter Wuille
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Toshi Morita
• 2014/06/06 [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
• 2014/06/06 [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Wallet nLockTime best practices Aaron Voisine
• 2014/06/06 [Bitcoin-development] Wallet nLockTime best practices Jeff Garzik
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Gregory Maxwell
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Gregory Maxwell
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Adam Back
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Peter Todd
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Gregory Maxwell
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Peter Todd
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Adam Back
• 2014/06/06 Re: [Bitcoin-development] # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." <<<<NOT Pieter Wuille

• Later messages