On 03/12/2014 08:55 PM, William Yager wrote: > The proposed BIP uses a bloom filter, so it has both plausible deniability > *and > *typo checking. The bloom filter is optimized for two elements and will > catch something like 99.9975% of typos, despite allowing two different > passwords.
Ok, I see. So the spec allows one real and one fake password. That is something I don't consider plausible deniability. I am not saying that this solution is wrong, I find it quite interesting, but it's not plausible deniability. ;-) >> I'm afraid one would end up with code generated in one client that is >> unusable in a different client, because the client's developer thought >> that using fancier algorithm instead of the proposed ones was a good idea. >> >> > This is clearly in violation of the spec. Ah, I misunderstood. I thought that outsourcing the KDF means allowing the 3rd party to use any KDF instead of the specified ones. What would be the reason to outsource if this is not possible, anyway? -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak <st...@gk2.sk> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
