On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:40:40PM +0000, Ricardo Filipe wrote: > 2014-03-25 13:49 GMT+00:00 Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org>: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:45:00AM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> wrote: > >> > >> > Bitcoin doesn't scale. There's a lot of issues at hand here, but the > >> > most fundemental of them is that to create a block you need to update > >> > the state of the UTXO set, and the way Bitcoin is designed means that > >> > updating that state requires bandwidth equal to all the transaction > >> > volume to keep up with the changes to what set. Long story short, we get > >> > O(n^2) scaling, which is just plain infeasible. > >> > > >> > >> We have a fundamental disagreement here. > >> > >> If you go back and read Satoshi's original thoughts on scaling, it is clear > >> that he imagined tens of thousands of mining nodes and hundreds of millions > >> of lightweight SPV users. > > > > Yeah, about that... > > > > https://blockchain.info/pools > > > > On-topic: > This argument is quite the fallacy. The only reason we have that few > pools is because each of their miners doesn't find it feasible to mine > "on their own". if you count the individual miners on those pools you > will get to the scale Gavin was trying to point out.
Yeah, that's part of my fundemental disagreement with him: I draw a sharp line between mining - the act of validating and constructing new blocks - and hashing - the act of solving proof-of-work problems. The latter definitely has incentives to decentralize due to simple physics: it's cheaper per unit hashing power to get rid of a small amount of waste heat than a large amount. The former requires a full node, and that full node is a fixed cost overhead related to the number of transactions per second. Any fixed cost overhead discourages decentralization, and encourages centralization. > Nevertheless i think that is just a minor disagreement, since tree > chains help decentralization. Yup. Quite importantly, the model is for any one miner to be able to fully participate at the same level as any other miner by mining some section of the tree. As your reward is linked to blocks mined, there will always be some level at which you are mining blocks at a reasonably low variance and you don't need to join a pool to achieve that low varience. Equally your resources to keep up with that part of the tree can be made reasonably low, and that cost only grows at the log of the total transaction volume. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000000f4f5ba334791a4102917e4d3f22f6ad7f2c4f15d97307fe2
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoinemail@example.com https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development