On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote: > > On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> wrote: > > Yes you are dicking around. > > I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talking > to its P2P interface.
Ah, sorry, that wasn't clear to me. > The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand the > protocol, aids debugging > and now comes handy to create a side chain. Indeed, which is why I've done a lot of work on a reimplementation of the Bitcoin scripting system as well: https://github.com/petertodd/python-bitcoinlib/blob/master/bitcoin/core/scripteval.py Which has this cheery warning at the top: """Script evaluation Be warned that there are highly likely to be consensus bugs in this code; it is unlikely to match Satoshi Bitcoin exactly. Think carefully before using this module. """ I'll be adding a FFI interface to libconsensus in the future... and I probably should make that warning scarier... -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000000ffb7a576b7aa5236c53f51ec07ccf174067beed3398056
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
