On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote:
>> And allegations that the project is "run like wikipedia" or "an edit war"
>> are verifyably untrue.
>> Check the commit history.
> This was a reference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin
> were to do a pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he
> would revert it. And I fully believe he would do so!


This is the only reddit comment I've made using the word revert in
recent memory, so I know you couldn't be referring to another.

>> I was recently in a situation similar to what Gavin is in insofar as a 
>> design dispute that could improperly solved by a git push. I'm pretty 
>> impressed he hasn't given in and done a midnight push. It's cool to see him 
>> back channeling support.
> Such a change would be immediately reverted.

And, I probably should have continued "and resulted with an immediate
revocation of commit rights on the assumption that his account had
been compromised."

There is nothing controversial about that.

Bitcoin-development mailing list

Reply via email to