bitcoindev  

Messages by Date

• 2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Craig Raw
• 2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 pyth
• 2025/12/11 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Oghenovo Usiwoma
• 2025/12/11 Re: [bitcoindev] Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/11 [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction defenwycke
• 2025/12/11 [bitcoindev] Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval victor perez
• 2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust Eric Voskuil
• 2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust Erik Aronesty
• 2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Re: Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust Eric Voskuil
• 2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration אושר חיים גליק
• 2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Re: Splitting more block, addr and tx classes of network traffic defenwycke
• 2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain (now on GitHub) Lazy Fair
• 2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Q-Lock: Quantum-Resistant Spending via ECDSA + Hash-Based Secrets Amarildo
• 2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust 'uuowwpevskfcordh' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Jonas Nick
• 2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Peter Todd
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Olaoluwa Osuntokun
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Olaoluwa Osuntokun
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/09 [bitcoindev] CTV activation meeting on IRC - Thursday 18 December 17:00 UTC /dev /fd0
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Boris Nagaev
• 2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/12/09 [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Boris Nagaev
• 2025/12/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/08 [bitcoindev] Request for early peer review of two BIP drafts (BUDS and segOP) Callum
• 2025/12/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Greg Maxwell
• 2025/12/08 [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/08 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Nagaev Boris
• 2025/12/04 [bitcoindev] Splitting more block, addr and tx classes of network traffic Antoine Riard
• 2025/12/04 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Craig Raw
• 2025/12/04 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Oghenovo Usiwoma
• 2025/12/04 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Craig Raw
• 2025/12/02 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
• 2025/12/02 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
• 2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA (SPHINCS) Performance Optimization Techniques 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Peter Todd
• 2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA (SPHINCS) Performance Optimization Techniques Nagaev Boris
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Melvin Carvalho
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] op_ctv still has no technical objections /dev /fd0
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Erik Aronesty
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Erik Aronesty
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Peter Todd
• 2025/11/28 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Pieter Wuille
• 2025/11/28 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Jon Atack
• 2025/11/28 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Tim Ruffing
• 2025/11/28 Re: [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA (SPHINCS) Performance Optimization Techniques Tim Ruffing
• 2025/11/28 Re: [bitcoindev] Benchmarking Bitcoin Script Evaluation for the Varops Budget (GSR) 'Julian' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/27 [bitcoindev] Re: op_ctv still has no technical objections 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/27 [bitcoindev] op_ctv still has no technical objections Erik Aronesty
• 2025/11/23 [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA (SPHINCS) Performance Optimization Techniques 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/22 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Saint Wenhao
• 2025/11/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
• 2025/11/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Bill MacDonald
• 2025/11/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 /dev /fd0
• 2025/11/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Sjors Provoost
• 2025/11/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Jon Atack
• 2025/11/21 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Ethan Heilman
• 2025/11/21 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Mat Balez
• 2025/11/21 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/21 [bitcoindev] Re: AI-assisted drafts and disclosure Oghenovo Usiwoma
• 2025/11/21 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/20 [bitcoindev] Re: AI-assisted drafts and disclosure 'nt yl' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/20 [bitcoindev] Announcing Penlock v1: Paper-Based Secret Splitting for BIP39 Seed Phrases 'Rama Gan' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/20 [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Lazy Fair
• 2025/11/20 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Standardization of On-Chain Identity Publication 'Edyth Kylak Johnson' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/20 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Oghenovo Usiwoma
• 2025/11/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Bitcoin Mechanic
• 2025/11/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Bitcoin Error Log
• 2025/11/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Jon Atack
• 2025/11/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Improve Bitcoin’s resilience to large-scale power grid failures and Carrington-type solar storms Edil Guimarães de Medeiros
• 2025/11/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 David A. Harding
• 2025/11/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Bryan Bishop
• 2025/11/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 David A. Harding
• 2025/11/18 [bitcoindev] New bitcoin backbone code release + Tx relay v2 update Antoine Riard
• 2025/11/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/17 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Luke Dashjr
• 2025/11/16 [bitcoindev] Improve Bitcoin’s resilience to large-scale power grid failures and Carrington-type solar storms Alexandre
• 2025/11/16 [bitcoindev] Re: OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea Eric Voskuil
• 2025/11/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Melvin Carvalho
• 2025/11/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
• 2025/11/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Motion to Activate BIP 3 Greg Sanders
• 2025/11/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
• 2025/11/12 [bitcoindev] Re: Motion to Activate BIP 3 Greg Sanders
• 2025/11/11 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/11 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork 'Bitcoin Eagle' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/10 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Lucas Barbosa
• 2025/11/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Benchmarking Bitcoin Script Evaluation for the Varops Budget (GSR) 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: BIP54 implementation and test vectors Antoine Riard
• 2025/11/09 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork onyxcoyote
• 2025/11/09 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/09 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Peter Todd
• 2025/11/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Murch
• 2025/11/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Chris Riley
• 2025/11/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Daniel Buchner
• 2025/11/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
• 2025/11/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork 'Bitcoin Eagle' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/07 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Edil Guimarães de Medeiros
• 2025/11/07 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/07 [bitcoindev] Benchmarking Bitcoin Script Evaluation for the Varops Budget (GSR) 'Julian' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/06 Re: [bitcoindev] LNHANCE a soft-fork package Brandon Black
• 2025/11/04 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Ruben Somsen
• 2025/11/04 [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
• 2025/11/03 [bitcoindev] LNHANCE a soft-fork package 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/02 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
• 2025/11/02 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Antoine Riard
• 2025/11/02 Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation adiabat
• 2025/11/02 Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/11/02 Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Garlo Nicon
• 2025/11/01 Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation Boris Nagaev
• 2025/11/01 Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/01 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/11/01 [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation Tadge Dryja
• 2025/11/01 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
• 2025/11/01 Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/11/01 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: segOP potential BIP discussion 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Antoine Riard
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Matt Corallo
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/31 [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Garlo Nicon
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/10/31 Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Tim Ruffing
• 2025/10/30 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Melvin Carvalho
• 2025/10/30 [bitcoindev] Re: Policy restrictions Was: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/30 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Doctor Buzz
• 2025/10/30 [bitcoindev] Re: segOP potential BIP discussion defenwycke
• 2025/10/30 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Martin Habovštiak
• 2025/10/30 [bitcoindev] Policy restrictions Was: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/30 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/30 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Melvin Carvalho
• 2025/10/30 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Tom Harding
• 2025/10/30 [bitcoindev] Re: By: Doctorbuzz1 {GitHub} Limit "Bulk Dust" with a default filter or consensus. Doctor Buzz
• 2025/10/30 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Bitcoin Error Log
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Michael Tidwell
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Erik Aronesty
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Max
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Michael Tidwell
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork /dev /fd0
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies yes_please
• 2025/10/29 [bitcoindev] Re: By: Doctorbuzz1 {GitHub} Limit "Bulk Dust" with a default filter or consensus. Doctor Buzz
• 2025/10/29 [bitcoindev] By: Doctorbuzz1 {GitHub} Limit "Bulk Dust" with a default filter or consensus. Frenchanfry
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Antoine Riard
• 2025/10/29 [bitcoindev] segOP potential BIP discussion defenwycke
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/29 [bitcoindev] [Concept] Anticipation Pool - Off-chain scaling using miner-validated transaction forwarding Jakob Widmann
• 2025/10/29 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies TokyoBitcoiner
• 2025/10/28 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/28 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Erik Aronesty
• 2025/10/28 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Martin Habovštiak
• 2025/10/28 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Majorian
• 2025/10/28 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: BIP54 implementation and test vectors 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Kyle Stout
• 2025/10/27 Re: [bitcoindev] op_return spam is beneficial Erik Aronesty
• 2025/10/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Jal Toorey
• 2025/10/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Jameson Lopp
• 2025/10/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork TheWrlck
• 2025/10/26 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/26 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/26 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP54 implementation and test vectors Antoine Riard
• 2025/10/26 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Peter Todd
• 2025/10/26 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Jameson Lopp
• 2025/10/26 [bitcoindev] op_return spam is beneficial Erik Aronesty
• 2025/10/26 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/24 [bitcoindev] Public disclosure of 4 Bitcoin Core security advisories 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/24 [bitcoindev] Full Disclosure: Debug console history storing sensitive info in bitcoin core v24.0-v30.0 /dev /fd0
• 2025/10/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Add importprivkeys RPC blocktraveler
• 2025/10/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/21 Re: [bitcoindev] Add importprivkeys RPC 'Email para newsletters' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/21 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.3 Released 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/21 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Garlo Nicon
• 2025/10/21 [bitcoindev] BIP54 implementation and test vectors 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2025/10/20 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
• 2025/10/18 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v30.0 Released fanquake
• 2025/10/18 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Keagan McClelland
• 2025/10/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Andrew Poelstra
• 2025/10/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Andrew Poelstra
• 2025/10/18 Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2025/10/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. /dev /fd0

• Earlier messages
• Later messages