I just posted a summary on the "Segregated Witness" thread.
On 02/15/2018 11:22 PM, Nelson Perez wrote: > I'm also interested in this subject and would like to contribute in any > way I can. But for that it would be interesting to get a quick summary > of the current state. I can see the latest update on the segwit branch > happend back in november. > > But looking at that branch I can also see that a lot of what one would > think is required is already done. The Transaction class already has a > list of witnesses, which are instances of the TransactionWitness class. > But I'm not that familiar with how all of this gets integrated into the > rest of the library. > > So what would be required to do next? > > Best regards > Nelson > > On Saturday, January 27, 2018 at 2:13:15 PM UTC-5, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > > See progress on the segwit branch and discussions on this mailing list. > It has stalled somewhat in recent months though. > > > On 01/25/2018 10:22 PM, v e wrote: > > HI, > > I am curious as if there is any effort from the bitcoinj > developers to > > bring segwit wallets as part of the library? > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "bitcoinj" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bitcoinj" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.