I just posted a summary on the "Segregated Witness" thread.

On 02/15/2018 11:22 PM, Nelson Perez wrote:
> I'm also interested in this subject and would like to contribute in any
> way I can. But for that it would be interesting to get a quick summary
> of the current state. I can see the latest update on the segwit branch
> happend back in november.
> 
> But looking at that branch I can also see that a lot of what one would
> think is required is already done. The Transaction class already has a
> list of witnesses, which are instances of the TransactionWitness class.
> But I'm not that familiar with how all of this gets integrated into the
> rest of the library.
> 
> So what would be required to do next?
> 
> Best regards
> Nelson
> 
> On Saturday, January 27, 2018 at 2:13:15 PM UTC-5, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> 
>     See progress on the segwit branch and discussions on this mailing list.
>     It has stalled somewhat in recent months though.
> 
> 
>     On 01/25/2018 10:22 PM, v e wrote:
>     > HI,
>     > I am curious as if there is any effort from the bitcoinj
>     developers to
>     > bring segwit wallets as part of the library?
>     >
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "bitcoinj" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bitcoinj" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to bitcoinj+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to