also, the planes weren't flying level, they were both a bit canted on the
roll axis.
tack
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Erik Curiel wrote:
>
> It's a fake. As John pointed out to an earlier pass-around of this pic,
> home boy would not stand there calmly if a jet was that close. Those
> things are loud. And the camera surviving the collapse is pretty
> unlikely.
>
> Also there's the fact that there's no exhaust plume coming from the jet
> engines, and a jet travelling at 500+ mph wouldn't appear without some
> blurring at such close range unless the shutterspeed were insanely
> fast---unlikely in a camera that prints the date on the image.
>
> E
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, David Schupner wrote:
>
> > - I don't know if I believe this one or now .. but
> > here's the pic.
> >
> > -Schoop
> >
> > This picture was taken by a tourist atop the World
> > Trade Center. His
> > camera was found in the rubble, he has not yet been
> > found. But his
> > picture will be etched in our minds forever.
> >
> > =====
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________
> > David [EMAIL PROTECTED](510)487-9489
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com
>
>
--
------------------------------------------
1st Amendment: Void where prohibited
http://freesklyarov.org
http://www.anti-dmca.org
