>>>>> "tack" == tack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tack> also, the planes weren't flying level, they were both a bit
tack> canted on the roll axis.
Keep 'em coming. As I get this pic emailed to me from various
sources, I am armed to reply with my list of doubts collected from
skeptics world wide. Here 'tis so far:
1. The jet would be extremely loud and neither the picture taker nor
subject would be oblivious
2. The jet is in sharp focus even though it is moving at 500+ mph
3. There are no exhaust plumes from the jet
4. The guy is wearing heavy clothes for a warm day
5. The fact that there is a date on the photo is suspicious, because
most people do not use this feature. Too good to be true.
6. The camera would likely not survive the fall
7. The plane in the pic is flying level, but the planes in both
attacks were canted on the roll axis.
