>
>       Actually, if *YOU* had any sense at all, you'd let them get
>       trashed and fried and stop doing Microsoft's QA work for
>       them.
>
>       Maybe when enough people are snapped by enough IE virii, then
>       the software will be made more secure from the beginning - thus
>       meaning that you have to send fewer mails like this, thus
>       making the Internets a safer place for (l)users.

Perhaps your internet connections are so fat that you have suffered no
appreciable performance loss for a large part of this year from all the
stupidly avoidable viruses that went around.  I'm not so lucky.

Sure, I'd prefer that M$ did their own goddamm security work from the
beginning.  But I'm not going to not do what I know is good right now
(trying to cut down on internet insecurity in the only way currently
possible) just because I have some wide-eyed dream about how much better
it would be if I could have things another, currently impossible way.

Nietzsche said it better:  "Too often we know the good without doing it,
because we also know the better without being able to do it."

E

-- 
Erik Curiel
sometime web-engineer/almost philosopher

"The affairs of human beings are not worthy of great seriousness,
and yet we must take them seriously."
                                ---Plato, *The Laws*



_______________________________________________
Bits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits

Reply via email to