> That's utterly weird. The intended method of using JUnit is to run it > manually a couple times a day and it returns either 'everything passed' or > 'these tests failed'. Adding all that extra stuff seems completely at odds > with it's 'do the simplest thing' philosophy (which, by the way, JUnit > doesn't really do either, but that's another story...) > Yeah, pretty useless. I suppose, in theory, if you were on a fairly big project, and were doing some kind of daily build schedule the guy in charge of the project might want some kind of printout like that. maybe. Also seems kinda un-XPish to have the build-dude not be talking to the boss every 20 minutes.
What in particular is your issue w/ Junit? I've found it to be really convenient to work with. It's pretty straitforward, works well with Ant, etc. The idea of just write a method called 'testThis()' and the testrunner takes care of running it for you is pretty nice IMHO. -Lkb _______________________________________________ Bits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
