Lorin wrote: > > When I used it (it might be better now) it required you to make a class to > > do all your testing, rather than just adding static methods, which was a > > rather unnecessary step. > > No, you still create TestCase classes. It's hard to see how you have a > test framework in Java that actually called methods inside your classes. > Unless you decided to make every class implement 'Testable'.
You could have test methods be all the private static methods which start with 'test'. I dunno if scanning for those is one of the things prevented by the inane 'security' features of that language though. A note to anyone considering creating a language: not allowing free-floating functions is just dumb. It isn't 'pure', it's just dumb. -Bram _______________________________________________ Bits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
