On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Erik Curiel wrote:

> Get off your fucking high-horse.  You're not the last word in how
> everyone must administer their boxes.  There are different approaches,
> with good arguments on many sides.

        You really are a peice of work.

        Here.  I'll quote from the "Essential System Administration":

                "Because of the potential for much more damage, the
                current directory should not even appear in root's
                search path, nor should any relative pathname.  In
                addition, none of the diretories in root's search path,
                nor any of their higher-level components, should be
                writable by anyone else but root;  if one is, then
                someone could again substitute something else for a
                standard command, which would unintentially be run
                as root."

        The most recent edition I have is the 2nd;  it's page 226
        in this one.  It is preceded by several examples how one
        could get root access this way and is followed by several
        vulnerabilities concerning permissions on .login files and
        scripts placed in those.

        This is basic, basic, basic stuff.  Like, "first day you
        have root access" stuff.

> It's hard to take someone seriously who has such an obviously closed
> mind.

        You have this total "touchy-feely-there-is-no-such-thing-
        as-an-absolute" defense for just about everything, don't
        you?


_____________________________________________b r a n d o n  h a r r i s___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          www.gaijin.com



_______________________________________________
Bits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits

Reply via email to