> > so basically, he only wants it they're the only ones who benefit, and > > victims can't defend themselves. > > heh. so, who wants to bet valenti's (really) personal info is up on the > net inside of a day if they actually passes? fucker better be careful > about what he asks for.
on that note, they could be picking a fight. With immunity on their side, they could egg actual hackers in to a fight, then slap them with the fraud and abuse act. I think the real defense is to create a p2p system with a trust framework, authentication and encrypted traffic. We could all put our copywritten works on it, and if at any time RIAA or MPAA member/subsidiary actors claim their works are on the network, it will have meant they've circumvented our copy protection scheme, and we can turn the DMCA around on them. We can then also use this new bill to attack them directly, provided valenti's caveats aren't included. tack _______________________________________________ Bits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
