On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, tack wrote: > on that note, they could be picking a fight. With immunity on their side, > they could egg actual hackers in to a fight, then slap them with the fraud > and abuse act. > > I think the real defense is to create a p2p system with a trust framework, > authentication and encrypted traffic. We could all put our copywritten > works on it, and if at any time RIAA or MPAA member/subsidiary actors > claim their works are on the network, it will have meant they've > circumvented our copy protection scheme, and we can turn the DMCA around > on them. We can then also use this new bill to attack them directly, > provided valenti's caveats aren't included.
i dunno, i'm still partial to fire. let the motherfucker burn. i'd get more satisfaction over watching that jackfuck get turned into a smore than i would watching him go down in the courts. -- christian void - [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.morphine.com/void/ gpg key available on request jay is my hero. _______________________________________________ Bits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
