and when you sat on it you could see over the wheel. :) -e
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, jay wrote: > i liked the bat book. it was just fat enough to hold the rest of my books > upright. not that you really need it for anything. i think i only referred > to it maybe four times since i bought it. > > =jay > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > "Eric J. Pinnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > : > > :I just have to jump in here. Sendmail is pretty fucking easy. Forget the > > :bat book. Forget the hacking sendmail.cf. Use the feature set and the m4 > > :parser and you can get it to do anything you want. > > : > > :People think sendmail is this voodoo when it's really not. Sendmail is > > :pretty bad ass. > > > > I gotta agree with Eric here. I haven't tried any of the "alternate" > > systems, because I've never found a need to, and I can be pretty > > retarded when it comes to these things. Install from source, do some > > really basic config stuff, and it just goes. Sure, ten years ago, you > > needed to use the thousand-page book to make it go, but things are > > pretty darn simple now. If you like postfix or whatever, that's cool, > > but I don't see any justification for learning a new system just to > > get away from sendmail. > > > > Are we missing something? > > > > -- > > DVS > > This is the planet of Six Billion Dancing Monkeys. Enjoy it while it lasts. > > _______________________________________________ > > Bits mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits > > > _______________________________________________ > Bits mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits > _______________________________________________ Bits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
