Hello All:

Thanks for the kind words Henry.

Telnet would be happy to assist TAUG members that want to take advantage of 
this sort of an arrangement.  We would need to go over some of the details with 
the group, but I'm pretty sure we can find a way to get it done and could even 
help with some of the management type issues.

We like to think that our IP network is ideal for VoIP customers.  We only use 
quality transit providers and we are directly peered with most other carriers 
in Canada.  In addition to the ITSP (DID / SIP Trunk) services that we provide 
ourselves, our network is only a few hops away from most of the other service 
providers like Voice Network, Comwave, ISP Telecom, and Unlimitel (usually less 
than 5, and in some cases less than 2).  This is the result of either direct 
peering with those carriers, or direct peering with their ISP.

It might be best to setup a conference call for those who may be interested in 
pursuing this further.

Regards,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Apache [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry 
L.Coleman
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location

I have to agree with Ian on this one. The TAUG is not a business entity and has 
no legal standing.
Therefore, we (whoever that might be) could'nt sign any contracts on behalf of 
TAUG because we don't
in the legal sence exist. Sorry to be such a kill-joy but that's the way it is.

PS If you want some space at 151 Front St. then I would start with Telnet (Bill 
Sandiford)
he is a member of our group and has good pricing.

Henry L.Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca]
-------------------------------------------------



> Ian Darwin<
> I've thought about it but never got it organized. There are numerous
> administrative issues, such as: who is the legal entity that will
> contract with the colo provider? what do you as a co-op do when a member
> can't  pay? Who will spend the several hours every month forever
> consolidating the funds from members to the colo? Who pays the excess
> during months when some sections are vacant (e.g., what happens if one
> member pulls out 10U and it takes you a few months to replace them?)
>> I have pricing from one of the colo provider which is
>>
>> Full Rack30A 110V AC Power
>> Remote Switch PDU
>> 100 Mbps Dedicated Unlimited Unmetered Bandwidth
>> $2199/month
>>
> How many U is that "full rack"? I think I've seen "full rack" describe
> several different heights of racks.
> A 1U server would cost $2199/n. If n=48, that's $45/month, which seems
> quite good
> for unmetered! If n=30, that's about $75/mo which is still not bad for
> unmetered.
> Again, assuming 100% usage.
>
> I'm sure there are other issues to consider...
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to