Oh, I thought I had replied to this. I'm also looking for a home for one HP DL380.
I'd be in for 2Us Regards, Alex Kink On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Bruce N <[email protected]> wrote: > > All right, we got five people now. Wondering if we can cross post this to > user list too for more exposure? This is a group thing, shouldn't be any > problem. Right Dave? > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > > > Anyone else looking for co-location, shared, dedicated hosting? > -Bruce________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:18:14 -0400 > > Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location > > To: [email protected] > > CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > > > > I would like to toss my hat in as well. > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Bruce N> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Going through the posts I can see the following people interested: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > [email protected] > > > > [email protected] > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please add your e-mail address to the list and then we can agree on terms > or choices. Like to see this happening really quick. I think you should add > your name even if you are looking for Dedicated hosting rather than > co-location because we can even get aggregated co-lo + dedicated servers > even if required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Bruce > > > > > > > >> Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:26:21 -0400 > > > >> From: [email protected] > > > >> To: [email protected] > > > >> CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > > > >> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location > > > >> > > > >> So is this a go or no go? I'd be interested in placing a box or two out > > > >> there if we can make something work. > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Bruce N> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks for the clarification Erik. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Hello Paul, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> You may not get the best "shared" deal out there but it's much less > > > >>> headache than with a true co-op system anyways. Would you actually go > out > > > >>> and sue the guy with only 1U server just because he bailed out? I guess > you > > > >>> never filed in courts to know what the costs are to sue people for > every > > > >>> single little thing out there. A co-op system like this would never > have the > > > >>> money to come up with the paralegal fees even. So, you are not much > more > > > >>> secured anyways with such a system; anyhow, by picking one person I > meant > > > >>> just a rep to grab good prices like Erik said. For a co-op system once > you > > > >>> calculate the administration cost, insurance cost for bail outs, > etc...you > > > >>> are already loosing whatever you thought you might have saved in the > first > > > >>> place. What I purposed was a separate contract btw the individual and > co-lo > > > >>> provider for every single member so issues like what you mentioned > never > > > >>> happen and still you get a better rate than going in individually. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Again, just a thought. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -Bruce > > > >>> > > > >>>> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 22:34:23 -0400 > > > >>>> From: [email protected] > > > >>>> To: [email protected] > > > >>>> CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [biz] Idea about Shared Co-Location > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Erik Turk wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> I think the co-op is one method of providing the desired service. > > > >>> Another way is for us to > > > >>>>> say to existing providers - hey, we have 40 people who want this type > > > >>> of service - what > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Then you are just 40 individuals. With your own bandwidth constrains, > > > >>> without being > > > >>>> able to combine the traffic into a good deal with 95 percentile. If > that > > > >>> was a good > > > >>>> option, we'd all already be hosting our 1U server. > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> can you do for us, and then each of us makes an individual decision > > > >>> whether or not to > > > >>>>> enter a business relationship with that provider. My understanding is > > > >>> that Bruce was > > > >>>>> mentioning the latter as an option. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Neither of the 40 people would likely be able to get 24/7 access, > since > > > >>> you're only a 1U > > > >>>> customer. No aggregate bandwidth to allow us to peak etc. etc. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Paul > > > >>>> > > > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> _________________________________________________________________ > > > >>> Find info faster and easier with Internet Explorer 8. > > > >>> http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9655583 > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Find info faster and easier with Internet Explorer 8. > > > > http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9655583 > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Anthony Boyington > > _________________________________________________________________ > Find info faster and easier with Internet Explorer 8. > http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9655583 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
