-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Joey Morris wrote:
> xOr wrote on Aug 18 at 04:23 pm:
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Joey Morris wrote:
> >
> > > xOr wrote on Aug 18 at 12:56 am:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Joey Morris wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > When using the stacked window cycling in bbkeys-0.8.2 on blackbox-0.61.1, I
> > > > > have to hit <ENTER> once I've cycled to the window I want in order to give
> > > > > control to that window and kill the cycling menu. It seems to me that simply
> > > > > releasing the keys would be enough to give control to the desired window.
> > > > > This behavior only occurs with the stacked cycling. For linear cycling, I
> > > > > only have to release the keys; hitting <ENTER> is not necessary. Is this a
> > > > > feature or a bug? If a feature, what is the rationale behind the requirement
> > > > > to hit <ENTER>?
> > > >
> > > > How it works is.. bbkeys will hold the menu up until <enter> is pressed,
> > > > or until all of the modifiers for the key combination are released. If
> > > > your key binding for window cycling doesn't have any modifiers in it, then
> > > > the menu will stay open until you hit <enter> because otherwise you'd only
> > > > be able to switch between 2 windows. so, it's actually a feature :)
> > > > anyways, that's the low-down.
> > >
> > > My key binding for NextWindow is Mod3+Tab and for PrevWindow is
> > > Mod3+Shift+Tab. I've assigned Mod3 to the Super_L and Super_R keys, which
> > > are what I've assigned the Windows keys on my keyboard. To cycle in reverse,
> > > using the PrevWindow binding, I don't need to hit <ENTER>, so bbkeys must be
> > > interpreting Shift as a modifier but not Mod3. Is this correct?
> >
> > Ok, well then the problem was as this, bbkeys did have a ModMask
> > associated with the XK_Super_[LR] keys. Nor did it have keys associated
> > with the Mod3Mask, so I've associated the XK_Super_[LR] keys to the
> > Mod3Mask, so your configuration should work fine. Below is a patch
> > which will make your configuration work.
> >
> > xOr
> > - --
> > you have no chance to survive make your time
> >
> > - --- bbkeys.cc 2001/08/10 18:51:47 1.48
> > +++ bbkeys.cc 2001/08/18 21:21:57
> > @@ -1281,6 +1281,10 @@
> > case XK_Num_Lock:
> > return Mod2Mask;
> >
> > + case XK_Super_L:
> > + case XK_Super_R:
> > + return Mod3Mask;
> > +
> > case XK_Meta_L:
> > case XK_Meta_R:
> > return Mod4Mask;
>
> Thanks, that fixed the problem. But I'm curious: if someone were to map
> their modifiers to their keys in a way different from what is in
> ToolWindow::KeycodeToModmask (the function modified by the above patch),
> would that break things?
yep :)
xOr
- --
you have no chance to survive make your time
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7fv408mPQRGtSu14RAmE4AJ9R9FTkqceToK1HMhBwYsB1mNLagACdF4Me
MatcuXVn/d4JNvik1CDSSC4=
=Wmei
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
