On Friday 23 January 2004 03:31, Ciprian Popovici wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:54:52 -0800 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > 5) if the current toolbar were to be removed from blackbox the code > > wouldend up being at least as large as bbkeys. So what is the gain? > > More pieces means more code. So your "minimal" setup is actually using > > more memory and cpu. Plus it has more people inventing the same wheels > > in subtly different ways. As it is bbkeys and bbpager both have to > > implement mini-wm like code to keep up. the toolbar will be similar as > > well. Then what? We have the bbmodule app which draws a toolbar and a > > pager as well as watching keybindings and displaying the application > > menu? Why is that any betterthan shoehorning the code into blackbox? > > Then I, not being familiar with libbt and the code, have the wrong idea > about libbt. I always supposed it was meant to smooth exactly such problems > by having common code that the tools can reuse. >
It is there so that people can re-use our code and look like blackbox. Mostly it is intended for slit app authors and the bbkeys/bpager folks. The lib does not have the window manage code in it, just the visual code and the underpinnings like the Menu class. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] List archives: http://asgardsrealm.net/lurker/splash/index.html Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
