On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:14:27PM +0100, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote: > * Anthony Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jan 02. 2005 07:22]: > > However, both are apparently Blackbox 0.65, and the difference in > > source RPM package numbers may just reflect that fact that SuSE may > > have created a new package for SuSE 9.2 rather than re-use the one > > available for 8.2. > > > > The executables do vary in file size, which may indicate that they are > > actually different versions: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l /usr/X11R6/bin/blackbox > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 432596 2003-03-17 14:10 > > /usr/X11R6/bin/blackbox > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l /usr/X11R6/bin/blackbox > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 457315 2004-10-05 00:45 /usr/X11R6/bin/blackbox > > It's the same version, the reason it varies, is because things like X, > glibc and gcc have changed. > > Have a look at rpm -q --changelog blackbox, where you'll also see no > version updates. > > I considered updating to the CVS version to get UTF8 support, but > decided against it since it seems to unstable still.
Interestingly, I installed SuSE 9.3 on a spare machine yesterday and, although I am now used to the chunkier look of the title bars in Blackbox using SuSE 9.2, thinner title bars are back in SuSE 9.3! The: [separator] [include] (|xdg_menu --format blackbox) [separator] Idea in /usr/share/blackbox/menu is very cool btw. On a seperate note, does anyone know why the Ubuntu Blackbox package maintainers have apparently taken a decision not to include a menu template with Blackbox 0.70 in Ubuntu 5.10, and Blackbox 0.65 in Ubuntu 5.04? Does the menu template not come with Blackbox source tarballs? If so, it seems an odd decision on the part of the Ubuntu folks to leave it out. -- Anthony Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] List archives: http://asgardsrealm.net/lurker/splash/index.html
