Re: sh -c answers thanks!

[Jason vanRijn Kasper]

umm, and why can't we leave it as is?

On Wed, 30 May 2001 10:01:22 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >    C) Eliminate the ability to run compound commands in menu
> >       items, but leave it in for rootCommands.
> >    D) Provide two menu items, say [exec] and [cexec]; the first
> >       would just use "sh", the second "sh -c". rootCommand would
> >       still use "sh -c". For the most part this would make things
> >       work like they used to before the exec code was changed.
> 
> either of these, weighted towards C.
> 
> 
-- 
---->%----------%<----
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
Systems     Engineer
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
VORFA