> > But what about not using any /bin/sh? > > I prefer F) > > F) Provide two menu items, say [shexec] and [exec]; the first > using "sh -c" and the second not using any "sh". rootCommand > would still use "sh -c". (If users want old behaviour, they would need > to change their [exec] menu entries to [shexec].) > > (I am sure you saw it, but I did provide a patch that works for me the > past week.) > this would definately be appreciated.
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Jeff Raven
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! cthulhain
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Edgar Bonet
- malicious rootCommand (was Re: sh -c answer... Jeremy C. Reed
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Jason vanRijn Kasper
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Markus Ottenbacher
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Joao Pedro Franco e Silva
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Jeremy C. Reed
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Jeremy C. Reed
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Kyle Donaldson
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Jeff Raven
- Re: sh -c answers thanks! Derek Cunningham
