As the original author of toolbox (the style conflaguration tool), this was 
a question i got from time to time.  I originally wanted to make it "easy" 
to create and edit styles.  I also didn't want to write anything in Xlib. So 
I originally went with Gtk+ before switching to QT.  So in fact, it could be 
much, much worse =).  (note: gtk+ sucks ass, i won't debate this).  But the 
basic answer is, if you want a tool that's easy to use, that is useful and 
expansive, and that will be finished in your lifetime, it's gotta be written 
in a toolkit.  And if you're going to use a toolkit, you should use the best 
one available.
  -Ryan


>From: Marco Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Marco Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM>
>Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:18:25 +0200
>
>Hello,
>
>I read with great pleasure that *there is* finally something that:
>       configures your style file...
>       your keybindings
>        can configure bbpager, bbmail, bbapm, bbweather, bbpal,
>               bbwibble, and
>               MORE!
>
>All in one place, and I can understand why now "no more development
>will be done on bbkeysconf or toolbox". However, I'm confused (and
>without bbconf) because it's written in Qt. After spending some year
>to find the fastest and leanest/minimalist wm around, and some days
>last week to build a fully functional system with the minimum possible
>usage of rpms, disk space, ram and cpu, (read "no kde/gnome here"),
>should I now install a tiny thing like the Qt libraries just to
>configure the more minimalist wm I could find?
>
>This is not an anti kde thing, finding it using gtk would have been
>the same: couldn't it have been using some smaller lib, or (excepted
>styles, of course) run happily within an xterm?
>Isn't this a contradiction?
>
>Any feedback is welcome.
>
>               Ciao,
>
>                       Marco Fioretti
>
>
>--
>According to one popular definition, craziness is doing the same thing
>over and over but expecting different results.


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Reply via email to