On Mon, Nov26,01 16:11, Ben Neuman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:35:18PM -0500, Derek Cunningham wrote: > > On Mon, Nov26,01 13:23, Dave Price wrote: > > > for graphical browsers, you might look at skipstone > > > > > > aloha, > > > dave > > > > > I personally find Skipstone to be buggy, non keyboard friendly, and it has a few UI >pains (for example, it uses the typical GTK+ single click/double click/triple click >behavior when selecting text; this kind of sucks for a browser, though). I'd >recommend Light. It can be found at: > http://www.ne.jp/asahi/linux/timecop/ > > It required some screwing with the Mozilla headers to get working(it's a GTK+ >Gecko-based browser), but in the end it was worth it. But, seriously, X on a 486 is >simply unrealistic. Stick to the console.
Actually... I was looking at skipstone.. and thinking "cool"... the I smacked myself (mentally) a bit... and came to a personal conclusion, feel free to accept it if you wish. It's based on mozilla, and as such, I've found that Galeon (also based on mozilla) was a dog. When I load Konq... I'm happy... it's responsive, and there's definately no lame interface choices... so why change? Konq is good (well, i'll s/good/great/g; just as SOON as I can get flash/javascript working... no need for advice on how to do this.. i'm aware of the proceedures, I'm fairly confident it has something to do with the slackware packages... but anyway), period. DC -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle.
