Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01-Jan-2002 Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > If this is intended to be a release candidate, it should be tested > > longer than just a week. > > > > It has been (-: Why do you think there has been such a delay between > prereleases? No, my point is the following: You released 0.62.0pre1 - I assume this includes some changes in the code over the last "pre-whatever" version. Now this new release needs to be tested, over and over again before it should be called 0.62.0 (proper). IMHO, a week is not enough. It should be two or three, I think. -Jan P.S.: Please configure your MUA so it honors the Mail-Followup-To header (I don't need 2 copies of the mail ;-) -- finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
