>> > If this is intended to be a release candidate, it should be tested >> > longer than just a week. >> > >> >> It has been (-: Why do you think there has been such a delay between >> prereleases? > > No, my point is the following: > > You released 0.62.0pre1 - I assume this includes some changes in the > code over the last "pre-whatever" version. Now this new release needs > to be tested, over and over again before it should be called 0.62.0 > (proper). IMHO, a week is not enough. It should be two or three, I > think. >
Will see what happens.
