In the gothic chambers of the underworld on Wed 13 Feb 2002 at 07:37 -0500,
Alexander Volovics muttered darkly:

> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 05:42:55PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> 
 
> This is a reply to set things straight. 
> I have been horribly 'slandering' bsetbg's reputation :)
> 
> All the problems were caused by my sloppy handling of Imlib2 and
> all it's accoutrements. I had not noticed that even Eterm was not
> working properly.
> 
> Now this is fixed bsetbg handles pseudo-transparancy perfectly and
> I can work with background images as of old. Mea culpa.
> 
> (The only thing that remains is the 'tempfile' thingy but that does
>  not appear to cause any problems as far as I can see. So I don't
>  know if I will look for the patch (yet). Should I? ).
> 
> Alexander

bsetbg is currently undergoing a complete rewrite, which will include a
couple of nifty new features.

as for the tempfile thing, i believe this is something that shaleh has
added, since my original script makes its own tempfiles manually. i
prefer things this way so that's how the upcoming bsetbg will work,
unless someone can give me a good reason why i should use an external
program to make a temp file.

btw, if there are any feature requests, send them to this thread.

that is all! back to my whisky.

t.

-- 
4.0k -rw-rw-r--    1 zork     zork       17 Apr 4 17:38 .signature

Reply via email to