On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:27:37 -0500 > From: Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: NetBSD > > David Egan Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Jan Schaumann wrote: > > > > I just searched through the mailing-lists for "blackbox compile" and > > > found a few problem-reports, none of which seem to show this behaviour. > > > Maybe I overlooked it? Got a URL? > > > > Try your search as "libSM blackbox". > > http://www.google.com/search?q=blackbox+libSM+site:mail-index.netbsd.org > > Still doesn't show anything that's relevant (as we can see in your > ./configure output, -L/usr/X11R6/lib (where the X libraries are) is > passed to the compiler): > > > blackbox version 0.62.1pre0 configured successfully. > > > > Using '/usr/local' for installation. > > Using 'c++' for C++ compiler. > > Building with '-g -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include' for C++ compiler flags. > > Building with ' -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext' for linker flags. > > So after this, the compile process breaks down when exactly? Could you > post the error-message? > > -Jan > > -- > finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
The compile is fine. It's after a gmake install is run, and I adjust my .xinitrc to exec blackbox, and run startx that I get missing libraries. After running a ldd, it shows that the libraries that are missing are those that are found in /usr/X11R6/lib. Once that is added to the /etc/ld.so.conf, ldd shows all the libs fine. As I said in the original e-mail, I think this is a NetBSD thing. My initial e-mail was intended to informative (apparently, I didn't inform so well), not a request for assistance. David
