On Tue, Apr02,02 09:54, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > And we're also not catering to morons! :) > > > > I was attempting to not be insulting (-; >
*shrug* life's too short to walk on shells. > Seriously, from the user perspective, is having an empty menu actually be empty > that shocking? Must we advertise that this menu is indeed empty? IMHO, the only thing that would make sense, would be to drop the menu item entirely, unless it get something in it. Besides, the default menu doesn't have any empty menus... and most people have generated their own menus manually, so why would one leave a menu empty? > I almost > feel like I would be attaching "warning this hot chocolate you ordered is > indeed hot, we are not responsible for any burns that may result". hehe, catering to morons. The concerning part is that most of the world (well, at least N.A., I haven't travelled so I can't make such a broad general statement) does in fact include warnings such as the one you exemplify. -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Human beings act intelligently only after they have exhausted the alternatives" -- Abba Eban Registered Linux User Number 195825
