On Sep 30, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Chris Cairns wrote: > does it not complicate things? (Its only a question, not a > comment.....i am not a programmer) > I mean, i would try a1, and then move to a2 to find that some of the > things i did with a1 may be less stable now....and so on. And with > so many different releases by so many different people.....is it not > more difficult to move ahead? ....someone may work on some bugs on > B56a3 and other on B55 or B5X or on B54 and ultimately all these > efforts do not help to build just one single release which is better > than all. Its like linux-----so many different distributions and > all with their own advantages and disadvantages and their own bugs > and issues.......i guess thats not what open source is for. That > is why, i sometimes wish that the new QS to be released by Alcor > better not be open source. ..........so that whatever little time he > has to give to QS ....helps keep QS moving forward and not back and > forth........i mean, there are those who use QS all their life and > dont even want to try these new releases because of some issue or > other in each different release which takes their comfort away. (I > repeat, i am not a programmer.....so may be, i am completely > wrong......i am only presenting my views as an "user" of > QS.......plz dont take it as criticism.....i know you are all > working for QS and not for any monetary gains)
Don't take this the wrong way but... I'm not sure what's more confuzzling; the versioning or your post. :) You're return key not working?
