thanks Howard......I liked your idea of documenting but as much as i know, the list of weaknesses would be really big. The thought of simply having to look at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver/browse_thread/thread/dc0b65e1c60b3c68# scares me.
thanks nontoppo for conforming to my view that QS moves back and forward......(i was scared, i was going to face the music if i was the only one who thought so) Mohammed , my return key is fine. i typed the above post from Mail so the dots are not exactly where i wanted them (i mean, i did not want the "i" to stand out of every line) and i guess, even typing here (without using Mail) messes up the alignment. So in a way, i must avoid using "......" but i am so used to it that i cant change it. On Sep 30, 9:24 pm, nontoppo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 30, 5:04 pm, Chris Cairns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 30-Sep-08, at 9:04 PM, Patrick wrote: > > does it not complicate things? (Its only a question, not a > > comment.....i am not a programmer) > > Beta testing software often requires moving back and forwards between > versions, so they should stay put. Everyone who is working on the B5X > branch are using the google code repository, so I don't know why you > think there are different "versions", there are a series of builds > from the google code branch as it is being developed.
