Just 'updated' to b56a2 and I'm enjoying it so far. thanks for the tip.
On Dec 10, 1:17 pm, [email protected] wrote: > yeah, that rule doesn't necessarily apply for development builds. > > i have personally found B56a2 to be the most stable for me, although i > haven't tried the latest a4 yet. > > if you're really stuck, you can always try B54 > fromhttp://www.blacktree.com/?quicksilver > > On 10 Dec 2008, at 18:08, Wuffles wrote: > > > > > B56, got it from a google > > search:http://code.google.com/p/blacktree-alchemy/downloads/list > > > Went for the top one as I am ex Windows and really wasn't sure which > > to go for ;o) - Top one's usually best for Windows. > > > On Dec 10, 5:15 pm, Eris <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> It's probably me ;o) - I might just wait till I understand this > >>> machine a little more before trying again. Unless you can think of > >>> anything obvious. > > >> I can! Which version of Quicksilver are you using and where did you > >> get it? It's my understanding that some of the newer, "cleaned up" > >> builds are broken for some people. Have you tried any of the other > >> builds? > > >> I recall that the last official release didn't work for me on OS X > >> Leopard, and I also remember having hotkey activation problems with > >> one of the B56a* releases. I'm using a B56a* release right now, I > >> think it's the latest one, but it appears that Quicksilver does not > >> say which it is.
